A truth-seeking function for navigating reality across layers

Core notes: Timeline of Emergence / Biggest Questions

What Infinitism Is

Infinitism is not a belief system, ideology, religion, or moral doctrine.

It is a truth-seeking function.

I created infinitism because I could not find a coherent way to answer “why” questions without immediately running into contradictions between disciplines. Biology said one thing, anthropology another, religion another, philosophy another — and none of them were wrong, but none of them were sufficient on their own.

Infinitism exists to solve that problem.

At its core, infinitism asks:

What remains coherent when examined across multiple layers of reality?

Truth, in infinitism, is not what feels convincing, traditional, authoritative, or scalable —
it is what continues to hold when viewed from adjacent layers of existence.

The Core Rule

Truth persists where coherence holds across layers.
Claims that collapse when examined across adjacent layers are incomplete.

This rule applies everywhere:

Infinitism does not replace disciplines.
It integrates them.

What Infinitism Is Not

Infinitism cannot remove suffering or uncertainty — but it can help orient inquiry, reduce false certainty, and expose where answers stop being grounded.

It is a compass, not a destination.

How Infinitism Seeks Truth

Infinitism works by stacking perspectives, not choosing sides.

A claim is tested by asking:

If it collapses under cross-layer inspection, it isn’t rejected — it is incomplete.

This allows:

to coexist without being flattened into each other.

Limits and Subjectivity

Infinitism acknowledges that:

Even my own work is not exempt.

Infinitism carries my research, my synthesis, my pattern recognition, using infinitism itself as the method of verification. That makes my applications — including the timeline of emergence — one expression, not the framework itself.

Plurality is not a flaw here. It is expected.

Infinitism as a Scalable Framework

The optimal outcome is not everyone agreeing with my timeline.

The optimal outcome is:

If someone produces:

Then infinitism demands integration, not defense.

This is what makes it scalable and self-correcting.

What Infinitism Splits Into

Infinitism itself is the method.
From it emerge applications.

1. Timeline of Emergence

A discipline of infinitism that maps when reality becomes capable of expressing new patterns.

This is my application of the method:

It exists to answer “why” questions by showing what was even possible at a given time.

2. Tree of Fractal Reality (TBA)

A future application mapping:

This will focus on structure, not chronology.

The Deeper Origin

Infinitism ultimately came from never settling.

From questioning:

And refusing answers that required:

Infinitism exists because I kept asking “why” —
and refused to stop when the answers became uncomfortable.

Final Note

Infinitism does not tell you what to think.

It helps you locate:

This document — and everything built from it — is my love letter to the world.

Forged through confusion, pain, betrayal, curiosity, and relentless questioning.

If it helps even one person orient themselves in reality more clearly,
then every step of building it was worth it.